Saturday 3 January 2009

Not So Hallowed Turf


What a strange Barclays (that's right; they haven't yet gone bust) Premier League season we have in the works, eh? We’re past the halfway mark, and not only has the current league leader never won the top division title, since the inception of the Premier League, but the famed “top four” sides have all been humbled by lesser teams already. Could this be the first season since 2005 that a club not known as Chelsea, Manchester United, Liverpool or Arsenal, breaks into a Champions League qualification spot? Aston Villa certainly think so.

So, with most teams having played 20 out of the allotted 38 games, we can spot some very unusual league positions. First of all, Liverpool – whom I thought were in disarray prior to the start of the season, due to off-the-field disruption heavily affecting player and manger confidence; and, might I add, who are a team that I believe didn’t spend very wisely in the summer (Robbie Keane being the biggest name to come in, has, for the most part, failed to adjust his style of play successfully enough to hit the back of the net as many times as he has done over the last few years) – are still setting the pace, with an impressive record of 13 wins, 6 draws and 1 defeat. For a Liverpool side marked by its similitude to the one that could only attain 4th place last May, this turnaround seems to be all the more remarkable. However, the Anfield faithful have ridden their luck more than once so far; 4 of those draws have come at home against Premier League “minnows” (Fulham, Hull City, Stoke City), and before their demolition of Newcastle United late last year, they hadn’t scored more than 3 times in a single match – an unappealing, unrivalled record on the part of the other three big name clubs.


In terms of failing to beat Fulham and Hull City, on the other hand, Liverpool have little to be ashamed of. Both aforesaid sides reside in the top half of the table; tremendous given that Fulham evaded relegation by the skin of their teeth in 2008, and Hull only managed to rise to the highest echelon of football competition in England – for the first time – after a play-off final victory against Bristol City. In fact, the accomplishments of these two teams this season are extendible; Fulham have the 4th best defence in the league, conceding only one more that Liverpool, and Hull have not only earned a home draw away to one of the nouveau riche, Manchester City, but have also beaten Arsenal away from the KC Stadium, and scored 3 times at Old Trafford (Newcastle United are the sole other team score away to Manchester United, and they netted just once). Perhaps Hull’s meteoric rise to Premier League stardom is and will be the most captivating story to emerge from this season. Or maybe it will be the prostration of Arsenal, as Arsène Wenger finally realises that his current crop of players are not good enough to win titles or cups without a wealth of experience elsewhere in the side.


Far be it from me to impugn the stance of Wenger, or his management style. It’s worked erstwhile; not necessarily with a succession of sides, but famously with the Manchester United string of youth players in the 90s, and, a long time before that, with the “Busby babes”. But therein lies the problem. Past prodigies do not uniformly reap future dividends, and nowadays, given the fervour the Frenchman has displayed, opposing sides refuse to downgrade the threat of Arsenal. What’s more, behind the scenes, stumbling blocks have aggravated any issues there may be, with the apparent lack of a mediator in William Gallas proving to be of magnified importance. Arsenal, for large proportions of the season up to now, have appeared stagnant, with their players lacking conviction, vigour. Crunch time, and they've fallen flat on their faces; losing to 2 of the 3 promoted sides. Therefore, Wenger has been left in a quandary – should he persist in using youngsters until one day, his perseverance and fortitude pays off with ascension into footballing history; or should he concede now, give up on his virtues and start afresh with the introduction of older, proven talented individuals, so that the young ones provide them with the respect that should be expected?


Whatever the case with Wenger and Arsenal, this season is one of the tightest yet. Predictions are near impossible to make with a large degree of certainty behind them, but do not wait in anticipation for the rankings to look like they do come May. In my humble opinion, there’s no need to watch out for a flurry of activity in the transfer markets, though past fortunes and misfortunes in matches may become inverted; Hull City are not safe yet! 8 points separate Wigan Athletic in 7th, and Stoke City in 18th. Anyone from 7th placed downwards is placed squarely in the unmerciful of looming relegation, whilst Chelsea could so easily become impervious to dismemberment.


And the second half is under way...

2 comments:

Unknown said...

this is definITELY the best season since 03/04... it really is so unpredictable..BUT i feel now that we've reached the half way mark i think that we'll start to see some of the teams we're used to dominating the league. Aston villa in the top 4?? they could, but i really doubt it unless Arsenal go from bad to worse. even if they do break into the big 4 this season i don't think they'll be able to maintain that postion next season. im not sure but i think everton knocked chelsea out of the top four a couple of seasons ago.. and now they're battling relegation. i do hope hull continue they're brilliant form, i think they're starting to scare the big 4, takin 4 points from Arsenal and liverpool. im not quite sure how liverpool are in top spot atm. they dont seem to be playin that great a degree of football, but they win games. not because i love arsenal, but i stilllllll think they have a chance of winning the league, a slim chance, but a chance nonetheless. i think its great fulham and west ham are in the top half of the table atm ( i think) its always nice to see london clubs doing good (xcept chelsea and spurs).

thew said...

arsenal have a fantastic first team, but once they lose a couple of first team members they're an average second tier team. the thing with the busby babes and the ferge fledgelings and the arsenal youngsters is that those teams were together for around 4/5 years and were winning youth cups before playing in the first team. with arsenal, young players have been added one by one each year and hence have not appeared quite as good as they should be. also with the united youngsters, they were implemented about 5 players at a time at the beginnings of seasons, whereas arsenal have edged them in slowly, one by one. but saying this , theres no way arsenal have the experience in their team to get the balance right to win.